Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Il 03/10/2012 08:44, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my >> implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite >> number of them, for each bug in each device. > > However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all > devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it > instead of a device feature bit. > > Paolo Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first! As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately. Since noone has leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now... Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
