Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v4] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > I'm okay with that idea, except there's a consensus that drivers should be in
>> > drivers/.
>> > 
> Like sound/ ?

My understanding is that this is something that's considered broken and should
be fixed, but I don't know what the holdup is.

> but what makes it a "driver"?

That's a good point.

Ok, so maybe I don't have any really good answers here. :-)

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux