On Thursday 09 June 2011 01:10:09 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:45:54 -0500 Timur Tabi wrote: > > > Add the drivers/virt directory, which houses drivers that support > > virtualization environments, and add the Freescale hypervisor management > > driver. > > It can't go in linux/virt or linux/virt/fsl instead? why drivers/ ? > > or maybe linux/virt should be drivers/virt ? See discussion for v2 of this patch. I suggested that drivers/firmware and virt/ as options, the counterarguments were that drivers/firmware is for passive firmware as opposed to firmware that acts as a hypervisor, and that virt/ is for the host side of hypervisors like kvm, not for guests. The driver in here most closely resembles the xen dom0 model, where a priviledged guest controls other guests, but unlike xen there is a single driver file, so there is no need to have drivers/fsl-hv directory just for this one file. We do have a number of other hypervisors that fit in the same category, so they can be added here later. Arnd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
