On 10/28/2010 03:52 PM, Ian Molton wrote: > On 28/10/10 15:24, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> The caller is intended to block as the host must perform GL rendering >>> before allowing the guests process to continue. >> >> Why is that? Can't we pipeline the process? > > No, not really. the guest may call for the scene to be rendered at any > time and we have to wait for that to happen before we can return the > data to it. Waiting for a response is fine, but can't the guest issue a second batch while waiting for the first? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
