[ CCed VHOST contacts ] On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:22:02PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My reasoning is that in the non-mirroring case the guest is > > limited by the external interface through wich the packets > > eventually flow - that is 1Gbit/s. But in the mirrored either > > there is no flow control or the flow control is acting on the > > rate of dummy0, which is essentailly infinate. > > > > Before investigating this any further I wanted to ask if > > this behaviour is intentional. > > It's not intentional but I can take a guess at what is happening. > > When we send the packet to a mirror, the skb is cloned but only the > original skb is charged to the sender. If the original packet is > delivered to localhost then it will be freed quickly and no longer > accounted for, despite the fact that the "real" packet is still > sitting in the transmit queue on the NIC. The UDP stack will then > send the next packet, limited only by the speed of the CPU. That would explain what I have observed. > Normally, this would be tracked by accounting for the memory charged > to the socket. However, I know that Xen tracks whether the actual > pages of memory have been freed, which should avoid this problem since > the memory won't be released util the last packet has been sent. I > don't know what KVM virtio does but I'm guessing that it similar to > the former, since this problem is occurring. I am also familiar of how Xen tracks pages but less sure of the virtio side of things. > While it would be easy to charge the socket for all clones, I also > want to be careful about over accounting of the same data, leading to > a very small effective socket buffer. Agreed, we don't want to see over-charging. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
