Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/03/2009 05:04 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Don't think so.  I suggest you copy lkml and Ingo.
>>      
> Sending off the complete set again?

Yes.

> Rebased against what?
>    

tip's x86/paravirt seems like a good choice (though only one patch is in 
there at present).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux