Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/03/2009 04:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of >>> Linux >>> internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the >>> possibilities pv-ops delivers though. >>> >>> On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not >>> touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to >>> become >>> fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in! >>> >>> This patchset splits pv-ops into several smaller config options >>> split by >>> feature category and then converts the KVM pv-ops code to use only the >>> bits that are required, lowering overhead. >>> >>> >> So has this ended up in some tree yet? >> > > Don't think so. I suggest you copy lkml and Ingo. Sending off the complete set again? Rebased against what? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
