Carsten Otte wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> Well, dup_mm() can't work (and now that I think about it, for more >> reasons -- what if the process has threads?). > We lock out multithreaded users already, -EINVAL. > Would be much better if this can be avoided. It's surprising. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
