On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:28 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Carsten Otte wrote: > > +struct mm_struct *dup_mm(struct task_struct *tsk); > > No prototypes in .c files. Put this in an appropriate header. Well, and more fundamentally: do we really want dup_mm() able to be called from other code? Maybe we need a bit more detailed justification why fork() itself isn't good enough. It looks to me like they basically need an arch-specific argument to fork, telling the new process's page tables to take the fancy new bit. I'm really curious how this new stuff is going to get used. Are you basically replacing fork() when creating kvm guests? -- Dave _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
