On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:12:04PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: > MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits? >> It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers >> we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time >> to time... but that didn't hurt enough yet, obviously. >> But now that you volunteered to take care of this... :) > Right. We only have defines for (machine_flags & bit). Looks to me like > the bits really should have a name on them. I've created a patch that > does this, but I want to talk it over with Martin before sending that one > out. Just introduce something like MACHINE_FLAG_KVM. The rest can be converted later. Unless you're bored and feel like fiddling around with assembly code :) _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
