MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits? > It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers > we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time > to time... but that didn't hurt enough yet, obviously. > But now that you volunteered to take care of this... :) Right. We only have defines for (machine_flags & bit). Looks to me like the bits really should have a name on them. I've created a patch that does this, but I want to talk it over with Martin before sending that one out. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
