Avi Kivity wrote: > Glauber Costa wrote: >>> >>> [Once a patchset has been applied and pushed (as seen on >>> kvm-commits), I prefer incremental patches] >>> >> But I think this is a very good case of an exception, since the >> applied patches would break bisect. I prefer to hear "damn glommer!" >> because of that than "damn glommer!!" because of a broken bisect. > > I fold them up before sending to Linus anyway, so upstream bisect > continues to work. For kvm.git, it's a choice between rewinding it a > bit (which may confuse anyone who pulls) and breaking bisect. > > ok, this wfm. I'll send incrementally next time. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
