Glauber Costa wrote: >> >> [Once a patchset has been applied and pushed (as seen on >> kvm-commits), I prefer incremental patches] >> > But I think this is a very good case of an exception, since the > applied patches would break bisect. I prefer to hear "damn glommer!" > because of that than "damn glommer!!" because of a broken bisect. I fold them up before sending to Linus anyway, so upstream bisect continues to work. For kvm.git, it's a choice between rewinding it a bit (which may confuse anyone who pulls) and breaking bisect. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
