Re: [PATCH] Use PCI revision field to indicate virtio PCI ABI version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
That's not what I was agreeing too. I don't want to plumb an ABI interface through virtio for each device. This is what I didn't like about having an ABI field in the first place. I'm thinking we should just drop both of these and instead just rely on feature bits.

Me also updating the our prototype code to the latest levels...

And I agree with Anthony. Feature bits seems to be a much better solution than ABI versions.

I agree that feature bits are the long term solution; but we need a short term solution before the ABI is stabilized. We don't want to add feature bits now, since that will encode virtio development history into those bits (likely consuming most of them).


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux