Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
That's not what I was agreeing too. I don't want to plumb an ABI
interface through virtio for each device. This is what I didn't like
about having an ABI field in the first place. I'm thinking we should
just drop both of these and instead just rely on feature bits.
Me also updating the our prototype code to the latest levels...
And I agree with Anthony. Feature bits seems to be a much better solution
than ABI versions.
I agree that feature bits are the long term solution; but we need a
short term solution before the ABI is stabilized. We don't want to add
feature bits now, since that will encode virtio development history into
those bits (likely consuming most of them).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization