Re: [PATCH 3/25] [PATCH] irq_flags / halt routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:10:28 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > > > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> > > > +#  ifdef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
> > > > +static inline int raw_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     return !(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF) || (flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC);
> > > > +}
> > > > +#  else
> > > > +static inline int raw_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     return !(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF);
> > > > +}
> > > > +#  endif
> > >
> > > You should really turn the vsmp special case into a paravirt client first
> > > instead of complicating all this even more.
> >
> > By "client" you mean a user of the paravirt interface?
>
> Yes

Ohhh, I see. You're talking about just the first piece of code inside
the #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT. In this case yes, I agree with you. It can
be done.

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux