On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:01:48 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But I worry that you're proposing adding what appears to be new > > Documentation-related machinery and infrastructure when there's already > > increased activity in that area from other people and we might all be > > headed in different directions and stuff. > > It does add an lguest-specific script: I aimed for the minimal > documentation script required to weave the code and documentation > (basically extracts and orders by comment prefix, because code order > isn't the same as optimal documentation order). > > This is great for lguest, where the entire codebase is small and > self-contained enough to be woven into a narrative, and the maintainer > is prepared to put in the cycles to keep it uptodate. > > But writing this documentation took *weeks*, to document 5000 lines of > code. Perhaps this effort, if merged, will inspire others, but I've > seen little indication so far: we have enough trouble getting them > documenting a single public function. Yeah, I suspect there will be insufficient interest and energy for anyone else to take this anywhere. Could you please redo the changes after "link lguest example launcher non-static", which made a fairly big mess? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
