On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Indeed, no code changes, and I feel strongly that it should go into > 2.6.23 because it's *fun*. And (as often complained) there's not > enough poetry in the kernel. There's a reason for that. There once was a lad from Braidwood With a wife and a hatred for FUD He hacked kernels for fun, couldn't get them to run. But he always felt that he should. See? So when you say "there's not enough poetry", next time you'll know why. You *really* don't want want poetry. Linus PS. Nothing rhymes with Ballalaba. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
