Rusty Russell wrote: > Any objections? > > Rusty. > === > Having KVM appear in the middle of "drivers" is kinda strange, and > having it alone under a menu called "virtualization" doubly so. > > 1) Move the "Virtualization" menu into the arch-specific i386 and > x86-64 Kconfig. > Virtualization is hardly x86 specific. How about moving it to top-level, and having individual items disable themselves on archs they don't apply to? Otherwise we end up with $NARCH copies of that Kconfig, each slightly different. The top-level entry can be made to depend on the archs that actually have some virt capability, so as not to show empty an menu. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
