Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/20/07, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Any objections?

Rusty.
===
Having KVM appear in the middle of "drivers" is kinda strange, and
having it alone under a menu called "virtualization" doubly so.


Hi Rusty !

Very good move, that I have thought about too... I believe that since
we're creating a Virtualization Menu, we should add
OS-level-virtualization there as well  (aka containerization) - the
following things: IPC virtualization (aka IPC namespaces), PID
virtualization, UTS virtualization. Those are 3 basic components that
went mainline into 2.6.19.

Article from OpenVZ:
http://www.linux.com/articles/59150?tid=136&tid=91

P.S. maybe rename those components from "IPC namespaces" to "IPC
virtualization" or even to "IPC containerization" it better reflect
it's internals?

--
-Alexey Eremenko "Technologov"
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux