Re: RFC: multiple address spaces for one process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carsten Otte wrote:
The big difference here is that LinuxOnLinux does represent guest virtual addressing in these mm structs where all other kernel based VMMs do represent guest physical in the user address space. That somewhat disqualifies LinuxOnLinux to share the commonality. Whether or not proposed patch makes sense for shaddow page tables is unknown to me, since we have nested paging on s390.

From an interface perspective, I think nested paging and shadow pagetables should be identical; after all, shadow pagetables are just a software implementation of nested pagetables. There seem to be 3 distinct types of VMM pagetable:

  1. UML/LoL vmas-as-pagetable/tlb
  2. shadow/nested paging
  3. direct paging

The multiple address space patch definitely makes sense for 1, but 2&3 both implement the alternate address space by directly pointing the CPU's paging hardware at a new pagetable, rather than going via the Linux VM.

   J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux