Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Santos, Jose Renato G wrote:
>   It seems that we will still need specific devices drivers
>   for each different virtualization flavor. For example,
>   we will still need to have a specific Xen netfront 
>   device that talks to a backend device in dom0, using
>   page grants, and other Xen specific mechanisms.
>   It looks like  will still need to maintain all the virtual device 
>   drivers and in addition we will now have to maintain 
>   another virtualization layer. 
>   

The hope is that the Xen-specific elements of the driver will be
restricted to Xen-specific things like grant tables, and the bulk of the
driver and its logic can be common.  Whether that can be achieved and
still retain the full performance/features of the entirely Xen-specific
netfront driver remains to be seen.  I haven't had a chance to look at
doing any Xen-virtio glue yet, so I'm not really sure how it will work out.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux