Re: huh startup_ipi_hook?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
I think the more things we can devolve out of paravirt_ops the better,
especially if they make well-defined self-contained interfaces of their
own.  I would be open, for example, to moving all the pagetable and
privileged instruction operations out into their own _ops interfaces
(but not right now).

I think this trend of moving things into smaller compact interfaces is the right way to go, and certainly the apic stuff can devolve, as well as privileged / pagetable ops. We can target that for .23, and it would go quite a ways towards giving a better foundation for x86_64 (even non-x86) paravirt to build on.

Zach
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux