Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Sure. > > Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own > bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to > paravirtualized environments? > The bootloader byte is already a bit too overused; I'm a little scared that we're going to run out of boot loader IDs as it is. We probably should add another field, and while we're at it maybe we should add a boot loader extension field. -hpa _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
