"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Next time I'm in a really tormenting mood I will fire up my >>> my ibm ps2 with it's 16Mhz 386 and 6MB and verify that all is working >>> well there. >> >> Well, that would be interesting. From a subarch perspective, it would >> just be the normal default, and in theory it should work fine. But I >> suspect the fpu emulator is probably broken, and non-WP is likely to >> have rotted, and lots of other things. Is that an MCA machine? > > Heh. I actually have a Voyager sitting in the garage. I've never > plugged it in or turned it on, but after this thread I'm wondering if my > rewrite of the setup code will have to entail dragging it in and trying > to boot it (please, no...) :) > > Incidentally, the rewrite is looking very promising so far. Apparently > there is tons of odd or just plain dead code lurking in setup.S. Just send it out for review before we merge it. We don't want to break things like loadlin support if we don't have to. If figure worse case we can convert your clean up back into assembly and have a more readable and maintainable setup.S :) Eric _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
