Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5] Paravirt_ops drop internal patches.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Some of these boot hooks do not need to be patched, in fact, it is better not
> to patch them at all and thus keep them totally private.
>   

I think I generally backed off on patching init functions and the like. 
Are these really the only ones which need adjustment?  I bet things like
the descriptor functions could be indirect/private with very little impact.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux