> > Because that's really the issue: do you want a "pretty" backtrace, or do > > you want one that is rock solid but has some crud in it. > > I just want an as exact backtrace as possible. I also think > that we can make the unwinder robust enough. Any reason you can't put the exact back trace in "[xxx]" and the ones we see on the stack which dont look like call trace as ?xxx? It makes the code a bit trickier but we depend on the quality of traces Alan _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
