On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 13:54 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > [ I assume you're talking about running on native hardware. ] > That's correct. > I haven't done any detailed measurements on what effect this will have, > but it does bring the actual executed instruction stream much closer to > the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT case, and so I would hope it would recover most or > all of the performance loss you've noticed. > I also hope that the performance can be recovered as this option could enabled in distributions' kernels in future. Tim
