Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Zachary Amsden wrote: > >>> Things like what? Do you mean the %[foo] asm parameter syntax? I think >>> those versions are no longer supported - Arjan posted a patch a few days >>> ago to convert a pile of asms to this form. Or do you mean something >>> else? >>> >>> >> I meant having an output in the clobber list, >> > > There's no output in the clobber list, just "memory" and "cc". The > paravirt_clobber() is the stuff which gets put in the .parainstructions > section which tells the patcher what registers are expected to be > modified at that callsite (including both temp and output registers). > Ah, ok. I didn't think gcc had grown the appropriate antlers yet to allow outputs in the clobber list. But the paravirt-clobbers, yes that makes sense. Zach
