On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 21:28 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: > So, as 2.6.21-rc1 is approaching, what is the upstream merge status for > the paravirt-ops backends? I believe VMI is in Andi's tree, plus or > minus some bugfixes that are still being whittled in, but Andi, do you > think the VMI code is in good shape for merging? > > It would be nice for everyone to clarify their upstream plans - is the > goal still to get Xen and lguest merged for the next kernel release? > > Rusty, you mentioned you had a patchset to push, when do you expect to > have it ready? I'm just doing the final file moving now (everything in arch/i386/lguest), expect to send out something within 48 hours (I need to sync up to latest git tree, too). > One of which is separating the paravirt-ops into GPL > and non-GPL exports, which we need consensus on where the line is, but > can't really achieve it until everyone is happy with the finalized set > of paravirt-ops. Any patch that tries to do this now would just cause > rejects later and slow all of our merges. Yes, I have a patch, but it breaks kvm. I'm waiting until things settle before fixing it. Cheers, Rusty.
