RFC: const_udelay in 018-delay functions patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 23:21 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 22:11 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) && !defined(USE_REAL_IO)
> >> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> >> +#else 
> >>     
> >
> > USE_REAL_IO? Is this defined anywhere?  Or just future-proofing?
> >   
> 
> It has to be used for SMP bootstrapping - IPI acceptance requires real 
> time cross-processor delay, even in a VM

No, that's USE_REAL_TIME_DELAY: USE_REAL_IO is not currently defined
anywhere AFAICT.

>  - and also can be added by a 
> top-level define to kernel compiles for driver domains for Xen to give 
> real time device delays.

Makes sense...
Rusty.
-- 
Help! Save Australia from the worst of the DMCA: http://linux.org.au/law



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux