RFC: const_udelay in 018-delay functions patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So I implemented udelay and ndelay through a single paravirt_op, 
const_udelay, instead of having either two separate paravirt-ops for 
udelay or ndelay, or a redundant const_udelay paravirt_op.  Anybody have 
any objection to reworking the patch this way?


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 018-delay-functions.patch
Url: http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20061024/d2cf30a5/attachment.bat 


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux