On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > That's a curious use of CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD... I think it would make > more > sense to use it in the parent directory: I agree, the dir fix below should go in independent to the CONFIG_COMPAT part. > diff -r 72c8bc5d88f4 drivers/xen/Makefile > --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile Thu Jun 29 13:04:30 2006 -0400 > +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile Thu Jul 13 11:33:30 2006 -0500 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ obj-y += core/ > obj-y += core/ > obj-y += console/ > obj-y += evtchn/ > -obj-y += privcmd/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD) += privcmd/ > obj-y += xenbus/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_UTIL) += util.o > > diff -r 72c8bc5d88f4 drivers/xen/privcmd/Makefile > --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd/Makefile Thu Jun 29 13:04:30 2006 -0400 > +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd/Makefile Thu Jul 13 11:37:18 2006 -0500 > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > > -obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD) := privcmd.o > +obj-y := privcmd.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += privcmd.o > > > There's no point in recursing into the directory in the first place if > the config variable isn't set... > > -- > Hollis Blanchard > IBM Linux Technology Center > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-ppc-devel mailing list > Xen-ppc-devel at lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel