Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:49:37AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>Congrats on getting this thrashed out. A few comments, most of which are >>boring style nits, but nonetheless ... will try to take a proper look >>later. >> >>General comment: >> >>Why is this style used: >> >>HYPERVISOR_foo_bar ? >> >>ie the capitalization of HYPERVISOR. Doesn't seem to fit with the rest >>of the kernel style. > > > It's also wrong. There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just > grab this namespace. make it xen_ or xenhv_. I think the intent was to create something generic enough for others to use. There were other projects that already intended to use the same model ... and please, lets not have one stack of this stuff for each hypervisor. So in general, I think the approach is correct, I was just whining about style stuff ;-) M.
