Re: some question about period scheduleing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 1 Dec 2013, vichy wrote:

> hi Alan:
> 
> 2013/12/1 Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, vichy wrote:
> >
> >> hi all:
> >> My connection like below
> >> ehci --> high speed hub -> full speed device
> >>
> >> I have some questions about period scheduling.
> >> 1. when creating  qh for full speed device,  why we set EHCI_TUNE_RL_TT.
> >
> > Are you asking why EHCI_TUNE_RL_TT is equal to 0?  I don't know -- it
> > looks like a mistake.  Do you find that changing it to 3 makes any
> > difference?
> Yes, when I change EHCI_TUNE_RL_TT as not 0.
> The transaction can keep going.

But if EHCI_TUNE_RL_TT is 0, the transfer doesn't work?

> >>     isn't it possible the full speed device return NAK during transaction?
> >
> > Of course it is possible.
> If so, why we use EHCI_TUNE_RL_TT default as 0?

Like I said above, I don't know -- it looks like a mistake.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux