Re: [PATCH] add new pid for alcatel re-shape some alcatel pid list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 10:32:28PM +0800, shu.suo wrote:
> From: "suo.suo" <treeui.old@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: suo.suo <treeui.old@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> index c3d9485..c6c4a3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,16 @@ static void option_instat_callback(struct urb *urb);
>  #define ALCATEL_VENDOR_ID			0x1bbb
>  #define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_X060S_X200		0x0000
>  #define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_X220_X500D		0x0017
> -#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_L100V			0x011e
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_0052		              0x0052
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_L100V			       0x011e
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_00B6		              0x00B6
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_X600                        0x00B7
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_Y800_X715              0x0191
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_0192                        0x0192
> +#define ALCATEL_PROCUCT_0194                        0x0194
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_01AA                       0x01AA
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_0203                        0x0203
> +#define ALCATEL_PRODUCT_0204                        0x0204

Why the very odd formatting of this list?

Also, why did you drop the linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list from
the cc:?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux