> > > This gives us some breathing room later to actually do the right
> thing
> > > without additionally performing renames all over the place to make
> > > imx5 -> imx53 (again)/imx51 (new).
> >
> > You may take matt's suggestion, it can reduce the code change now and
> in future.
> > We can only add device_id for imx51 in this patch, split imx53 and
> imx51's ops
> > when their differences are added in future.
>
> OK. Names of registers and bits also keep as is?
>
Yes.
Peter
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
