On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:09:16PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > So I'd like to take these for 3.13-rc1, and if they are fixes, take them > > > into the 3.12-stable tree (and older ones) when they hit Linus's tree > > > then. > > > > Ok, fine with me. Just to be clear though: are you asking me to delay > > these "long-standing" bugs because we're now at -rc5, or do you always > > want me to delay them for the next kernel release? > > Because we are at -rc5. Maybe something like this could go into -rc2 > and possibly -rc3, but come on, -rc5? Thank you for clarifying the line of where you cut off non-regression pulls for your usb-linus branch. I will make my future pull requests match that. > Look at all of the pushback Linus > has been giving maintainers on lkml, this shouldn't be news. I'm sorry for missing those emails; I don't normally keep up with LKML. I will strive to pay attention to future email Linus sends. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
