On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 02:25:54AM +0300, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote: > On 08/25/2013 12:48 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > >On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:15 +0300, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote: > >>This patch refactors the code in TRB_ENABLE_SLOT switch case in > >>handle_cmd_completion() into a fuction named xhci_handle_cmd_enable_slot(). > >Hi, > > > >it would be nice, in fact probably a requirement, for > >the commit message to explain what the benefit of the > >change is. > >That is, does it improve readability or something else? > > > > Regards > > Oliver > > > > > > > I see, i will fix this in the next version of this RFC. I would just add two sentences to each of these refactoring patches to the effect of: The function that handles xHCI command completion is much too long. Break it up into individual functions for each command completion. Assuming you do this, this patch looks fine. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
