On 8/20/2013 3:59 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi George,
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-dra7xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-dra7xx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..37e4c22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-dra7xx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+EXTCON FOR DRA7xx
+
+Required Properties:
+ - compatible : Should be "ti,dra7xx-usb"
+ - gpios : phandle to ID pin and interrupt gpio.
+
+Optional Properties:
+ - interrupt-parent : interrupt controller phandle
+ - interrupts : interrupt number
+
+
+dra7x_extcon1 {
You used 'dra7xx-usb' device name. Why did you use 'dra7x_extcon1' name?
What is meaning 'dra7x_extcon1'?
I will rename it to dra7xx_extcon.
extcon naming means various external connector device. e.g., usb, jack, etc...
So, I prefer 'dra7xx_usb' instead of 'dra7xx_extcon'. I have plan to divide
extcon device driver according to the kind of device.
okay will do it in v2
+static int id_poll_func(void *data)
+{
+ struct dra7xx_usb *dra7xx_usb = (struct dra7xx_usb *) data;
+
+ allow_signal(SIGINT);
+ allow_signal(SIGTERM);
+ allow_signal(SIGKILL);
+ allow_signal(SIGUSR1);
+
+ set_freezable();
+
+ while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+ dra7xx_usb->id_current = gpio_get_value_cansleep
+ (dra7xx_usb->id_gpio);
+ if (dra7xx_usb->id_current == dra7xx_usb->id_prev) {
+ schedule_timeout_interruptible
+ (msecs_to_jiffies(2*1000));
+ continue;
+ } else if (dra7xx_usb->id_current == 0) {
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB", false);
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev,
+ "USB-HOST", true);
+ } else {
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev,
+ "USB-HOST", false);
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB", true);
+ }
Should dra7xx_usb keep always connected state with either USB or USB-HOST cable?
I don't understand. So please explain detailed operation method of dra7xx_usb device.
In dra7xx only ID pin is connected to the SoC gpio. There is no way, currently to detect the VBUS on/off.
So I always default to either HOST/DEVICE mode solely depending on the ID pin value.
OK.
But I don't want to use kthread with polling method.
I recommend that you use interrupt method for cable detection.
All of extcon device driver have only used interrupt method without polling.
okay will remove the polling thread.
+ dra7xx_usb->id_prev = dra7xx_usb->id_current;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t id_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct dra7xx_usb *dra7xx_usb = (struct dra7xx_usb *) data;
+
+ dra7xx_usb->id_current = gpio_get_value_cansleep(dra7xx_usb->id_gpio);
+
+ if (dra7xx_usb->id_current == dra7xx_usb->id_prev) {
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ } else if (dra7xx_usb->id_current == 0) {
You should define some constant variable to clarify '0' meaning instead of using '0' directly.
okay
+ dra7xx_usb = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dra7xx_usb), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dra7xx_usb)
+ return -ENOMEM;
You have to add error message with dev_err().
devm_kzalloc itself should give some message.
ok.
+ status = extcon_dev_register(&dra7xx_usb->edev, dra7xx_usb->dev);
+ if (status) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register extcon device\n");
+ return status;
You should restore previous operation about dra7xx_usb->irq_gpio.
okay
+ }
+
+ dra7xx_usb->id_prev = gpio_get_value_cansleep(dra7xx_usb->id_gpio);
+ if (dra7xx_usb->id_prev) {
ditto.
You should define some constant variable to clarify 'dra7xx_usb->id_prev' meaning.
okay
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB-HOST", false);
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB", true);
+ } else {
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB", false);
+ extcon_set_cable_state(&dra7xx_usb->edev, "USB-HOST", true);
+ }
why did you do keep always connected state?
There is no way, currently to detect the VBUS on/off.
So I always default to either HOST/DEVICE mode solely depending on the ID pin value.
+
+ if (dra7xx_usb->irq_gpio) {
+ status = devm_request_threaded_irq(dra7xx_usb->dev, irq_num,
+ NULL, id_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED |
+ IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+ dev_name(&pdev->dev), (void *) dra7xx_usb);
+ if (status)
+ dev_err(dra7xx_usb->dev, "failed to request irq #%d\n",
+ irq_num);
If devm_request_threaded_irq() return fail state, why did not you do add error exception?
If interrupt fails I fallback to polling thread.
+ else
+ return 0;
If devm_request_threaded_irq() return success state, why did you directly call 'return'?
kthread_create operation isn't necessary?
Yes kthread is optional. Some boards doenot have the ID pin hooked onto the GPIO.
In such cases we will run the kthread and poll on the ID pin values.
+ }
+
+ dra7xx_usb->thread_task = kthread_create(id_poll_func, dra7xx_usb,
+ dev_name(&pdev->dev));
Should you use polling method with kthread? I think it isn't proper method.
You did get the irq number by using DT helper function and register irq handler
with devm_request_threaded_irq(). I prefer interrupt method for detection of cable state.
I also prefer interrupt method. If any implementation does not have ID pin connected to GPIOs then still
it could use the driver in polling mode.
As I mentioned above, I don't prefer interrupt method for cable detection.
I hope you meant, you prefer interrupt method for cable detection over
polling .
Polling method for detection isn't appropriate for extcon device driver.
Instead, I will consider whether to support polling method or not on extcon core.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
