Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:55:56PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> > + } else {
>> > + /*
>> > + * If the controller is not OTG capable, but support
>> > + * role switch, the defalt role is gadget, and the
>> > + * user can switch it through debugfs (proc in future?)
>>
>> It's not going to be in procfs ever, so that part of the comment can go.
>>
>
> I can delete now, but the role switch does not a debug function, we
> may not put it at debugfs, do you think so?
Even if we were to put the role switch elsewhere, it wouldn't be
procfs.
If there is indeed a hardware platform that intentionally allows
software to select the role, then yes. Right now, it is a debugging
feature.
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
