On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:09:32AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:49AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:19:47PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:01:32PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit 3b2f64d00c46e1e4e9bd0bb9bb12619adac27a4b: > > > > > > > > Linux 3.11-rc2 (2013-07-21 12:05:29 -0700) > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sarah/xhci.git for-usb-next-2013-07-23 > > > > > > That's just a branch, not a signed tag? Why not a signed tag? > > > > I'm confused. It certainly looks like a signed tag on my side: > > > > sarah@xanatos:~/git/kernels/xhci$ git show for-usb-next-2013-07-23 > > tag for-usb-next-2013-07-23 > > Tagger: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Jul 23 14:54:40 2013 -0700 > > <snip> > > Hm, you are right. I was expecting the git pull request to have a tags/ > line in it. Like my requests to Linus: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git/ tags/driver-core-3.11-rc1 > > Maybe that's a newer git thing, what version are you using? sarah@xanatos:~/git/kernels/xhci$ git --version git version 1.7.9 > Also, are > you sure the tag is on the server when you do the git-request-pull > command? Yes, the tag is on the server, my scripts check that, and fail if it isn't. I suspect the tags/ prefix is a new git feature since 1.7.9. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
