On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Alan Stern wrote: > >> > This isn't right. There are USB host controllers that use PIO, not > >> > DMA. The HAS_DMA dependency should go with the controller driver, not > >> > the USB core. > >> > > >> > On the other hand, the USB core does call various routines like > >> > dma_unmap_single. It ought to be possible to compile these calls even > >> > when DMA isn't enabled. That is, they should be defined as do-nothing > >> > stubs. > >> > >> The asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h file intentionally causes link > >> errors, but that could be changed. > >> > >> The better approach in my mind would be to replace code like > >> > >> > >> if (hcd->self.uses_dma) > >> > >> with > >> > >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_DMA) && hcd->self.uses_dma) { > >> > >> which will reliably cause that reference to be omitted from object code, > >> but not stop giving link errors for drivers that actually require > >> DMA. > > > > How will it give link errors for drivers that require DMA? > > It won't. Unless the host driver itself calls into the DMA API, too > (are there any that don't?). To my knowledge, all the host controller drivers which use DMA _do_ call functions in the DMA API. So they would still get link errors, even though the USB core wouldn't. Therefore adding the appropriate HAS_DMA dependencies should be straightforward: Try to build all the drivers and see which ones fail to link. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html