Re: How should we handle isochronous underruns?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> I understand the latency is effected by packet count in one URB,
>>>> and it shouldn't be related with URB count,
>>>
>>> This is true only when capturing.  For playback, the latency is the
>>> length of the entire pipeline.
>>
>> For playback, every URB submitted is added into hw table
>> immediately, then the data will be played to speaker. I don't
>> understand why the latency is the entire pipeline.
>
> A submitted packet will be transmitted only after all the other packets
> in the pipeline have been transmitted.

Yes, that is always true since EHCI HW will send out data(packet) to
device one by one at the scheduled frame/uframe according to the
order of URB submitting , so the USB audio driver can submit URBs
in advance, can't it?

Also could you provide the typical time one URB in audio driver may
span?

Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux