Re: How should we handle isochronous underruns?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Naturally, under normal circumstances this won't matter, because
>> underruns shouldn't occur.  But I know from experience that people try
>> to push the latency as far down as they can, which increases the
>> likelihood of underruns.
>
> I understand the latency is effected by packet count in one URB,
> and it shouldn't be related with URB count,

This is true only when capturing.  For playback, the latency is the
length of the entire pipeline.


Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux