>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph CHANG <josright123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Joseph> DM9620 is an USB2.0 network adapter rather than DM9601 USB1.1. This
Joseph> driver processed the RX data 4 bytes header, TX data 2 bytes header,
Joseph> make the control bit exactly right in PHY write function, and optional
Joseph> IFF_ALLMUTLI bit for RX control.
But dm9601.c already supports the dm9620 based devices. Why another
driver for the same hardware?
Please CC me on dm9601 related patches.
Joseph> Tested good for many platforms, include X86 desktop and ARM embedded.
Joseph> +static struct usb_driver dm9620_driver = {
Joseph> + .name = "dm9620",
Joseph> + .id_table = products,
Joseph> + .probe = usbnet_probe,
Joseph> + .disconnect = usbnet_disconnect,
Joseph> + .suspend = usbnet_suspend,
Joseph> + .resume = usbnet_resume,
Joseph> + .disable_hub_initiated_lpm = 1,
Joseph> +};
Joseph> +
Joseph> +module_usb_driver(dm9620_driver);
Joseph> +
Joseph> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx>");
I'm not the author of this file.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
