Dear Arnd and Roger, thank you for your answers. 2013/5/28 Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > Selecting NOP_USB_XCEIV is wrong as it in turn depends on USB_PHY. > > I'm not for depends as it would hide USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP in menuconfig. > I'm for explicitly selecting both, as it makes the user's life much > easier. > But I'm afraid maintainers might object to that. > > The other option is to enable the required drivers in omap2plus_defconfig. > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/97899 This seems a good idea to me, since many OMAP users boot with NFS and need USB directly working (Ethernet over USB). > Maybe you could just resend that patch after addressing Kevin's comments? It's sad that USB_EHCI_HCD is too instable to be added in omap2plus_defconfig. Still, USB_PHY and NOP_USB_XCEIV are needed since v3.10 for USB support (and harmless): should I send a patch adding those two in omap2plus_defconfig? Cheers, Adrien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
