On Monday 08 April 2013, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Here are the EHCI patches that I think are good for inclusion in 3.10, > > I hope you are willing to include them after the debacle over these > > patches in 3.9. > > > > The patches are all logically independent but sorted by priority, > > so decide for yourself how many you want to take, starting at the > > first one. The first six patches all have an Ack from Alan Stern > > and from the respective ARM platform maintainers. > > I don't see an ACK for the 6th patch from Alan, any reason for that? > > I've applied the first 5 for now, if you want the 6th one applied, > please resend. Thanks a lot! I had mentioned the fact that the last one is missing the ack in my email, maybe not prominently enough when I wrote: > > * The final patch is from me and still waiting for an Ack from Alan > > Stern, so please wait for his feedback before applying that one. It would be nice to get that in, but it's not as important for 3.10 since the only conflict between backends I expect is between Exynos and SPEAr. SPEAr is not widely used for all I can tell, and whether Exynos actually makes the multiplatform conversion is still an open question, since there are a number of missing patches and we are about to close the window for arm-soc patches as well. In 3.11, things will look quite different. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
