Michael Grzeschik <mgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:12:51AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:55:07AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >> > >> Agreed. What about the multi-td patch and the rest? Are you going to >> > >> resend them still? >> > > >> > > I will clean up this series first and add the following patch to it: >> > > >> > > usb: chipidea: udc: prepare qhead with dma_alloc_coherent >> > > >> > > The rest are cleanup and feature patches which will come in seperate >> > > series, as Felipe suggested. >> > >> > Felipe, since you have brought this up, which of these patches seem like >> > v3.9 fixes to you? They are all reasonable improvements, but I see no >> > reason sending them to v3.9, save for the first one. >> >> right. Looks like except patch 1, they should all go to v3.10 > > What about "[PATCH v8 7/8] usb: chipidea: udc: fix possible memory leak in _ep_nuke" ? > I added the "Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" on purpose. > > Worth it? Looks like a good cadidate for stable as well. I was mislead by "possible" in the subject when scanning through the patchset. It's a very real memory leak. Regards, -- Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
