On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:30:11PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Friday 15 February 2013 08:53:28 Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> > We have to let user space recover. To do so we need to indicate when > >> > exactly we dropped data. > >> > >> The problem with that is that this is likely to happen when a client > >> just doesn't care. It will just continue happily ignoring the read data, > >> writing new commands or whatever. Then the *next* client opening the > >> file for reading will see this error. > > > > Well, this may be a separate bug. Should the buffer be cleared when > > we run out of openers? > > No. A valid use case, currently working just fine, is using e.g. shell > commands to sequentially write and read, closing the file inbetween. I > don't see any reason to suddenly break that. It is a userspace visible > ABI. <snip> What ever was decided here? Can someone please send me the patch that you two agreed would solve this problem? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
