On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Li Fei wrote: > > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. > > Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei.li@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > index 5480352..f72dede 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > @@ -3148,12 +3148,13 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg) > > if (port_dev->did_runtime_put) { > status = pm_runtime_get_sync(&port_dev->dev); > - port_dev->did_runtime_put = false; > if (status < 0) { > dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "can't resume usb port, status %d\n", > status); > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&port_dev->dev); > return status; > } > + port_dev->did_runtime_put = false; > } I don't see much point in this. After a failed resume, the port's runtime PM status is undefined. Whether or not you do a pm_runtime_put_sync won't make any difference. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html